Posts Tagged ‘military’

Military Locs

Friday, February 5th, 2010

I guess it’s not just because of head gear after all.

Are twists and dreadlocks authorized? U.S. Navy Uniform Regulations, Chapter Two, Section 2, Article 2201.3:DEFINITION: Twists – A process by which two or more locks of hair are twisted together to form a rope-like appearance. Dreadlocks – Are mats of hair that have been allowed to grow out over time. Sometimes, if hair is simply left ungroomed for a period of time, particularly if the hair is naturally coarse and kinky, dreadlocks will form by themselves.

a. “Twist” hairstyles are not authorized because they fall within the guidelines of being faddish.

b. “Dreadlocks” are not authorized due to its conspicuous nature.

“Hairstyles shall not be outrageously multicolored or faddish, to include shaved portions of the scalp (other than the neckline), or have designs cut or braided into the hair. Hair coloring must look natural and complement the individual. Haircuts and styles shall present a balanced appearance. Lopsided and extremely asymmetrical styles are not authorized. Ponytails, pigtails, widely spaced individual hanging locks, and braids, which protrude from the head, are not authorized. Multiple braids are authorized. Braided hairstyles shall be conservative and conform to the guidelines listed herein. When a hairstyle of multiple braids is worn, braids shall be of uniform dimension, small in diameter (approx. 1/4 inch), and tightly interwoven to present a neat, professional, well-groomed appearance. Foreign material (i.e., beads, decorative items) shall not be braided into the hair. Short hair may be braided in symmetrical fore and aft rows (corn rowing) which minimize scalp exposure. Cornrow ends shall not protrude from the head, and shall be secured only with inconspicuous rubber bands that match the color of the hair. Appropriateness of a hairstyle shall also be judged by its appearance when headgear is worn. All headgear shall fit snugly and comfortably around the largest part of the head without distortion or excessive gaps. Hair shall not show from under the front of the brim of the combination hat, garrison, or command ball caps. Hairstyles which do not allow headgear to be worn in this manner, or which interfere with the proper wear of protective masks or equipment are prohibited. When in uniform, the hair may touch, but not fall below a horizontal line level with the lower edge of the back of the collar. With jumper uniforms, hair may extend a maximum of 1-1/2 inches below the top of the jumper collar. Long hair, including braids, which fall below the lower edge of the collar shall be neatly and inconspicuously fastened, pinned, or secured to the head. No portion of the bulk of the hair as measured from the scalp will exceed approximately 2 inches.
[Source 1 and 2]

I was talking to my dad about this (a marine veteran) and he replied, “Who’s hair? You mean the MILITARY’S hair?” I thought about it and I hate to say it, but once a person joins the military they do become the military’s property. It’s one of the things that they sign you up for. However, you shouldn’t have to feel obligated to join. Also, the fact that even natural hair-wearers with afro textured hair in general are being targeted for their hair even when they’re following guidelines doesn’t sit too well with me. I guess that’s one of the reasons why I wouldn’t join.

Discrimination in the Military

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

Update 08/27/09: It was brought to my understanding that the main reason why locs aren’t allowed is because many of the sizes worn are too thick for head gear, so for the most part, it’s for more of a safety issue and safety should always come first. Also, while there has been discrimination towards those with natural afro hair in the military, not all naturals in the military have faced this type of discrimination and it’s not an overall representation of the military, but of certain military personnel.

For years, the military had no problem with showing the black people who serve them that they had a Locs problem with common, natural afro hairstyles. Black females in particular were given slack for wearing small, clean-cut afros. The ones who wear locs weren’t shown much mercy either, as many of them were forced to cut them off.

When coming across this blog, it was bought to my attention that the military is at it again. This is the message that was sent to her from one of her readers:

Greetings Sister Karen:

I am one of your biggest fans. I have been following your website and blog for months. Thank you for this great avenue for women of color to share their thoughts and celebrate their natural hair. I was hoping that you can share this link below to friends of your blog/website One of my close friends who is in the US Air Force is being forced to chop her locks and relax her hair. We are asking everyone we know to sign this petition and also send a letter to your state representatives. Here is a brief synopsis of the matter at hand. Please share with everyone you know. Thank you in advance for your support!

It has come to my attention that the United States Air Force has a regulation, AFI36-2903 DRESS AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF AIR FORCE PERSONNEL, which in part, discriminates against African-American women serving in the Air Force. The code was recently updated to include a bans on a common natural African-American hairstyle, which the Air Force has called “dreadlocks”. Female personnel with neat, clean, professional well-kept hair are being forced to choose between cutting their hair and treating it with chemicals to conform with this regulation which I feel unfairly and unnecessarily discriminates against African-Americans. The regulation itself does not define “dreadlocks”. This leaves women with hair that is in no means a distraction or a detriment to their duties, subject to disciplinary action.

Please pass this information along to as many people as possible. Also, if you’re a blogger, you can blog about it as well. We have voices; let the military hear it loud and clear. Afros and locs are apart of who we are. If we don’t speak out about it, they’re going to continue seeing our hair as some sort of an oddity, and it’s going to be hard for everyone to proudly rock their natural hair and serve in the military in peace. If they know that they can use you, and force you to alter yourself without having to worry about getting a backlash from it, they will keep doing it. Don’t allow it to go on without a fight.

If you have a strong love for your natural hair and you’re the type of person who refuses to change it for anyone other than yourself, it would be best not to join the military. It’s just not worth it. The military needs you more than you need them, and they should accept you for who you are.

Make sure the sign the petition by going here.