Archive for the ‘Latest Controversy’ Category

What Did You Think of Natural Hair When Relaxed?

Friday, December 18th, 2009

On the Nappturality forums, someone started a thread asking how one used to feel about natural hair when they had the  “straight hair mentality.” According to the original poster, this was the meaning of straight hair mentality:

‘Straight Hair Mentality’ – the state of being brainwashed into feeling and believing, either consciously or unconsciously, that relaxed or straightened or looser textured hair is superior (be it “more beautiful”, “more manageable/easy”, “more versatile”, “more professional”, “more feminine” or any other excuse that either directly or indirectly, subtly or overtly is expressed through a number of different actions or words), creates a hierarchy of desired/desirable hair types and puts hair classified as ‘curly/kinky/coily/nappy’ at the bottom or low end of said hierarchy. May also be called ‘permie mentality’, ‘hot comb mentality’ or the lesser used ‘heat mentality’, ‘weave mentality’ and ‘wig mentality’. Examples of ’straight hair mentality’ include negative views and feelings of one’s own hair and/or the hair of others, misconceptions and fears that such hair will doom the wearer to a lower quality of life, and the constant or frequent use of chemicals of various types/heat/wigs/weaves to cover or hide the natural hair out of perceived dependence, insecurity, fear, internal issues/self-hatred, lack of knowledge or conformity into ‘mainstream’ society.

There were a few people in the thread who mentioned how whenever they would see representations of natural hair in the media, they would get offended because they felt they were trying to make black people “look bad.”

This made me think back to a post that a blogger made in the past, who made the statement:

We’re not all nappy anymore.  We can finally afford to having our hair looking right.

When she was confronted about it, a part of her response claimed that she wrote the post in favor of both those relaxed and natural.  That she had no problems with the representation of natural hair, and that she didn’t have any of the negative views on natural hair that many other black girls had growing up; she was just angry at the fact that there wasn’t an equal representation of black women with straight hair, that she felt they were showing more naturals in the media because she felt THEY had a view on negative view on naturally kinky hair, and that they wanted to make us look bad.  (Right…)

When I was both young and relaxed, I was very ignorant when it came to kinky hair.  Those who did my hair were ignorant when it came to taking care of kinky hair, the media that I was exposed to was ignorant to kinky hair, and almost everyone who I was raised around, including the children in the neighborhood (and their parents) were ignorant to kinky hair. 

In middle school, I remember feeling that those who were natural were only natural because they couldn’t afford to get a relaxer. I also can recall when someone went natural in high school, and how the “clique” that I was in made comments stating that she need to “get something done to her hair,” and at the time, I saw nothing wrong with that statement. Now I love our hair for what it is. I have also been in, out, and through natural hair enough to dispel all the myths. (I also know that while they felt nothing was done to her hair, that more than likely, she did do something to her hair.) I also used to think locs were weave that has been left in the hair permanently, causing it to bud over time.

Many of us never really get the guts to face the truth of the negative views on natural hair until after we go natural, and since naturals have been on both side of the fence, we already know how others may view it.  While I’m sure that there’s black women who have never had these negative views, I know there’s plenty people who still do.  You also have back peddlers who try to hide that fact, now that more and more naturals are speaking against it.    It’s similar to prejudiced person saying “I’m not racist!”

Were you ever guilty of having the “straight hair mentality?”  If so, what were your thoughts when you did?

Offensive Afro Cover? You Be the Judge.

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Publisher's Weekly Publisher’s Weekly is being attacked for a cover that they released this past Monday. I actually thought the cover was absolutely beautiful! I’m actually mad that I didn’t think of it. The photo is called Pickin’ (taken by Lauren Kelley in 1999). It was taken from the book W.W. Norton, Posing Beauty: African American Images from the 1890s to the Present by Deborah Willis.

Several people have voiced that they feel the cover is degrading to black women and they feel that the cover has nothing to do with the actual article, although I can get where they’re coming from.  The title is “Afro Picks!”   What I take from that is that it simply means their top picks of black books (and its trends) to be discussed.   Here was Publisher’s Weekly’s editorial director’s response to the uproar. Publisher's Weekly

The resulting response to the choice of that particular image and that coverline was not anticipated by the person most closely involved with this week’s cover. That person was me, PW senior news editor, Calvin Reid. I organize, edit, and oversee the annual feature story on black books. I chose the cover in collaboration with the magazine’s creative director and I wrote the coverline, Afro Picks!, which was intended as a pun to highlight a story that “picked” new black titles of interest. The image was reminiscent of the 1970s and appealed to me, someone who grew up in the middle of the 1970s-era wave of black pride, black power and big afros with big afro picks stuck right in the back. To me it is a sweet, tongue-in-cheek funny and striking image of quirky black hair power. And while it never occurred to me that anyone would be offended by these images, I was very wrong and I have to acknowledge that. Quite a few people were offended by it and outraged by what some perceive as a disparaging or degrading image of a black woman. I certainly regret offending anyone and while I still love that image, I intend to think long and hard about whatever image is chosen for next year’s cover.

Kudos to Lauren for taking such a beautiful picture. Lauren, if you’re reading this (which you probably won’t be), you did an awesome job. Publishers Weekly, if you’re reading this (which you probably won’t be), thank you for showcasing this image.

As a black woman who uses an afro pick, often sports her hair in an afro, and is an advocate of natural beauty, I’m letting you know right now: this photo doesn’t offend me. I don’t feel it’s degrading; I feel it’s empowering. It gives me a sense of pride and joy. I’m so happy to see people of various backgrounds showcasing the beauty and power of natural afro hair. If more people would have been more appreciative of it in the first place, natural afro hair wouldn’t be as taboo as it is now.

I also see a trend as to exactly what type of people this is offending when it comes to black people. It seems that many of the natural-haired black women I come across love the photo, while some of those who are ranting about it are relaxed. Is there a reason for this?

A question to Afro Glitz readers: Did you find this photo offensive? Also, if this same cover was published by a black magazine, would you be just as offended?

Keep Your Hands Off My Child

Monday, December 14th, 2009

I’m sure many of you heard this story by now. Recently in Milwaukee, a teacher cut off the braid of one of her students. LaMya Cammon was sitting in her chair playing in her hair (as many little girls do). LaMya Her hairstyle consisted of braids adorned with beads so of course, it made a clinking sound.

The sound that the beads were making annoyed the teacher. The teacher instructed the little girl to stop, but the little girl kept at it. Rather than simply putting her in time out, and or writing a letter to her parent as a civilized teacher should have, the teacher called the little girl up to the front of the class, took a pair of scissors, and cut off one of the little girl’s braids. She then scolded her and sent the LaMya back to her desk as she cried and classmates laughed. Here were the little girl’s words:

I went to my desk and cried, and they was laughing. She threw it away, and she said, ‘Now what you gonna go home and say to your momma?‘ And I said, ‘That you cut off my hair.’

Many people were wondering if this teacher was a black or white woman, but in my opinion, this isn’t about race. It would be equally wrong whether she’s black, white, or alien. If “found guilty,” which she pretty much is, the teacher will be charged with a $175 fine.

The charges sound like a slap on the risk, given the situation. I’d say that she would have to pay the mother and the daughter $175 each, and be put in permanent timeout from teaching. In addition, I would make her reenact the whole scene. Only this time, she would be the one getting a lock of her hair cut off.

Don’t get me wrong; the hair will grow back. However, this should have never happened, and a person like this never should have gotten a job as a teacher. There’s no telling how many more similar stories like this would arise if she were allowed to keep teaching. Did you read the part where the teacher said, “Now what you gonna go home and say to your momma?” It was almost as if she were trying to rub it in her mothers face, or that she were asking for a fight. This woman clearly has some demons other than the situation at hand, that she needs to deal with.

If a teacher did this to my daughter, there would be problems. I would probably even make sure to get the teacher’s face all over the news (CNN included), so that anyone who’s in charge of hiring teachers knows not to let her teach at their school. I’m surprised they kept her anonymous thus far.

What would you have done if this were your child?